I viewed the cataloging of rhetoric as dry and unfulfilling. However, I gained a greater grasp of the meaning of rhetoric through modern day examples and direct definitions given at the beginning of the article. What helped me in particular was the examples of how situations today can be rhetorical, "is someone an alcoholic or morally depraved? Is a child misbehaved or unable to concentrate because of an attention deficit disorder?" (Foss, Fossm and Trapp 2). To that end, does a chronological explanation of rhetoric provide clarity of its meaning or do examples of modern rhetorical situations provide clarity? While all the information in the article is relevant to the subject, its relevance to the individual may vary.

I sincerely hope I am understanding this concept of rhetoric correctly! If not, please let me know!
2) As a cell phone owner, user and texter, I am automatically entered into a realm of digital rhetoric. When texting, one must interpret typed words from the perspective of a "cell phone user". If your friend texts you, "I WILL BE THERE SOON" - it could be interpreted as an angry text (because of the upper-case letters), or it could be interpreted as a mistake (he/she must have accidentally had Caps Lock on) or it could be interpreted as urgent (urgency to be there soon marked by the upper-case letters), etc. The upper-case letters are the symbols with which we are interpreting the message. These interpretation of this symbol could be affected by; mood, time of day, relationship with the sender, place, etc.

Other symbols related to texting include; emoticons, acronyms, and picture/video texts. Each of these represent symbols to be interpreted by the receiver.
Again, I hope I am grasping the concept of rhetoric!
Works Cited
Foss, Sonja K., Karen A. Foss, and Robert Trapp. Prespective on Rhetoric. 3rd ed. Waveland Press INC., 1-9. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment